"By systematically tracing the by now familiar methods of establishing expertise and maintaining 'one-upsmanship' in the writings of Galen, B[arton] indeed succeeds in putting to rest the distinction between ancient 'science' and 'pseudo-science' and, at the same time, in giving a lively and many-faceted picture of intellectual power-struggles in the High Empire." —Veronika Grimm, Journal of Roman Studies
Journal of Roman Studies
"Until recently, little attention has been paid to the fortunes of the art of physiognomy between the Hellenistic and Renaissance periods. Barton's impressive, and in many ways provocative, study remedies that neglect." —Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences
Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences
". . . uses its case-studies to establish a new benchmark in studies of ancient knowledge—and very effectively, too. I have never read a better historiographical introduction, and Barton uses the idea of knowledge as rhetoric—borrowing judiciously from the philosophy and sociology of science, along with Foucaldian genealogy—to illuminate not only how power-relations produced knowledge-as-truth, but also the reverse. With elegance and economy, this approach works equally well with both the ancient era, her primary subject-matter, and the current intellectual context of such a study." —Patrick Curry, Times Literary Supplement
Times Literary Supplement