Kant is the figure in the western philosophical tradition that Levinas most resembles, yet there are important differences between them, most notably on the issue of autonomy versus heteronomy. Hitherto the relation between Levinas and Kant has not been clearly understood. It is the great virtue of Catherine Chalier's impressive book that these differences and similarities can be brought together in a clear presentation that shows how Levinas and Kant can complement each other in building a powerful moral vision.
Simon Critchley, University of Essex Chalier's reflection on a possible dialogue between these figures in illuminating for moral philosophy in general, and for an understanding of Levinasian ethics in particular.
Brigitt Sassen, McMaster University
Philosophy in Review
Chalier's accounts of Levinas's views draw on extensive knowledge of his works as a whole and are often exciting in scope and detail.... If you have wondered whether Levinas is a Kantian, you will find Chalier's knowledgeable book helpful for reflection on the question.
Deborah Achtenberg, University of Nevada Reno
Review of Metaphysics
Whereas most introductions to Levinas's thought take the reader by way of the history of twentieth century European philosophy, Catherine Chalier here succeeds in laying out Levinas's ethical philosophy by reference to Kant. What Ought I to Do? succeeds in making Levinasian ethics accessible to the broader philosophical community.
Robert Bernasconi, The University of Memphis