Richly suggestive, the book discovers poetry in the Romantic life sciences, and a science of life in Romantic poetry. Goldstein frequently enacts this chiasmus in her own writing, which is not only elegant but also rich in metaphors that render philosophy and theory material and palpable.
Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 The brilliance of Goldstein's analysis. . . will certainly spur new investigations in the interrelated areas of Romantic science and Romantic poetry. But perhaps even more importantly, her work transforms conventional thinking about historical materialism and the Darwinian progression that often underwrites it by exploding their linearity and individual insularity that ensue from the monopoly of current scientific and philosophical models.
European Romantic Review This is a field-changing book. Both original and gripping, the arguments Sweet Science mounts will alter how we think about poetry and science, the figurative language of poetry, and how poetry becomes, through Goldstein's rich and ingenious reading of Lucretius, a genuinely scientific mode of knowing.
Jon Klancher, Carnegie Mellon University Gorgeously written and masterfully argued, Sweet Science is a supreme achievement by Goldstein. . .will serve as an exemplar in the field of Romantic literature and science and inspire and educate seasoned and budding academics alike. Engaging poetry and science with equal amounts of dedication and rigour, Goldstein effectively transforms how we perceive both. Particularly striking is the way she makes her argument with precision and care, constantly orienting it within the existing Romantic materialist discourse and clearly outlining for the reader how her argument is to be located and understood in relation to the arguments that have been made by Marjorie Levinson, Kevis Goodman, Denise Gigante, Noel Jackson, and others.
The British Society for Literature and Science Goldstein's Sweet Science has been anticipated with a keenness unusual for a first book. It does not disappoint. More than a valuable rereading of Blake, Erasmus Darwin, Goethe, and Percy Shelley, this book offers a new chapter in the recent recovery of Lucretianism as a powerful shaping force in European literature and thought. It challenges longstanding assumptions about nature and culture, materialism and figuration, some that derive from the Romantic period itself. In the neo-Lucretian alternative excavated by Goldstein, the work of poetry is not inimical to, or even quite distinct from, the work of empirical science. Instead, empiricism and poetics emerge as interanimating one another, fully cooperative in the work of making a world. It is a bold thesis, deftly argued, with implications spelled out for the young Marx and, indeed, for ourselves.
James Chandler, University of Chicago Amanda Jo Goldstein's Sweet Science fuses her own generation's ethos of reparative reading
its readiness to be summoned into strangeness by language and letters
with both a level of erudition (across disciplines, languages, and genres), and a practice of argumentation (clear, consistent, and self-accounting) that are associated with earlier practices of scholarship and of critical reading. In other words, this study is itself a work of sweet science. Just as its arguments trouble the truism that the natural sciences are always progressive (here, Lucretius joins with post-classical physics, Goethe with twenty-first-century ontogeny), so its own extraordinary conduct and achievement challenge the other half of that truism, showing that the human sciences can indeed progress.
Marjorie Levinson, University of Michigan Sweet Science is a singular contribution. It decisively rethinks the history and critical grasp of the life sciences as they converge in literature and science in Romanticism, and its implications for critical theory and the rise of ecosemiotics are equally compelling.
Theresa M. Kelley, University of Wisconsin-Madison